<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Drug Injury Lawyer Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/</link>
      <description>Published by Pogust Braslow &amp; Millrood  </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>HughesNet Canadian Class Action?  Xplornet, C-Com, and Galaxy Broadband</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the HughesNet Class Action <a href="http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/09/pbm_files_class_action_against.html">lawsuit</a> filed by the law firm of <a href="http://www.pbmattorneys.com">Pogust, Braslow & Millrood, LLC</a>, which in part asserts claims by subscribers for unlawful early termination fees (ETF) and fraudulent business practices involving slow-broadband service, lack of Internet accessibility and connectivity, there have now been a number of inquiries from Canadian residents with similar Complaints.   </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/hughesnet_canadian_class_actio_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/hughesnet_canadian_class_actio_1.html</guid>
         <category>IT/Technology</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Overtime Pay for Interstate Drivers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Fair Labor and Standards Act, which establishes rules for employers concerning maximum hours and overtime wages, has several clauses that excuse some employers from having to pay time and one-half for overtime wages. One such exemption provides that getting paid time and one-half for overtime hours is not required for any employee with respect to who the Secretary of Transportation has power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Carrier Act (“MCA”).  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/overtime_pay_for_interstate_dr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/overtime_pay_for_interstate_dr.html</guid>
         <category>Class Actions</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:46:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ADT Alerted to its Own Overtime Violations</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On August 28, 2008, a group of current employees sued ADT Security Services, Inc. for failing to pay time and one-half for overtime hours worked, as required by the federal Fair Labor and Standards Act.  The employees include those with positions as service and maintenance technicians as well as commercial and residential installers also known as installation technicians.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/adt_alerted_to_its_own_overtim.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/adt_alerted_to_its_own_overtim.html</guid>
         <category>Class Actions</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:27:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Forest Agrees to Settle Securities Class Action for $65 Million</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, November 10, 2008, Forest Laboratories, Inc. filed a quarterly report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, revealing that it had agreed in principle to a settlement amounting to $65 million in <em>In re: Forest Laboratories, Inc. Securities Litigation</em>, 05-cv-02827 (S.D. NY).</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/forest_agrees_to_settle_securi_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/forest_agrees_to_settle_securi_1.html</guid>
         <category>Class Actions</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:09:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Report Highlights Yamaha Rhino Related Injuries</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Oct. 15, 2008, the <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/">U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission </a>released the 2007 <a href="http://www.yamaha-rhino-lawyer.com/media/2008/10/atv2007-cpsc-report.pdf">Annual Report </a>of All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV)-Related Deaths and Injuries, which compiled ATV-related fatality information available to CPSC staff as of Dec. 31, 2007, and ATV-related injury data for emergency-room-treated injuries occurring through Dec. 31, 2007.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/us_consumer_product_safety_com_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/us_consumer_product_safety_com_1.html</guid>
         <category>Product Liability</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:35:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FDA Mulls a Ban on Avandia</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA recently announced that it would consider whether to pull GlasxoSmithKline’s former top-selling drug, Avandia, off the market or allow it to stay on the market with stronger warnings after discovering evidence indicating that the drug may cause liver toxicity, resulting in liver failure and death. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/fda_mulls_a_ban_on_avandia_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/fda_mulls_a_ban_on_avandia_1.html</guid>
         <category>Adverse Drug Update</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:56:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>HughesNet Early Termination Fees Revisited?  The Sprint-Nextel Case</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the HughesNet Class Action lawsuit filed by the law firm of <a href="http://www.pbmattorneys.com">Pogust, Braslow & Millrood, LLC</a>, which in part asserts claims by subscribers for unlawful early termination fees (ETF), another lawsuit against Sprint-Nextel has now been filed in federal court.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/hughesnet_early_termination_fe.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/hughesnet_early_termination_fe.html</guid>
         <category>IT/Technology</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:33:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Preemption Update: Wyeth v. Levine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, November 3, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in <em>Wyeth v. Levine</em>, and we have the full draft transcript available for you here: <a href="http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/Wyeth%20v.%20Levine%20%28Oral%20Argument%20Transcript%29.pdf">Wyeth v. Levine (Oral Argument Transcript)</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/preemption_update_wyeth_v_levi_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/11/preemption_update_wyeth_v_levi_2.html</guid>
         <category>Preemption</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:29:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Preemption May Spell Tragedy for Women</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A report released yesterday by the national consumer rights group Center for Justice and Democracy entitled <a href="http://centerjd.org/archives/studies/BitterestPill%28f%29.pdf">“The Bitterest Pill – How Drugs Companies Fail to Protect Women and How Lawsuits Save Their Lives”</a> revealed the devastating consequences that the regulatory failures and inadequacies of the FDA have had, specifically on women.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/preemption_may_spell_tragedy_for_women.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/preemption_may_spell_tragedy_for_women.html</guid>
         <category>Preemption</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:21:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Brief Primer on Predatory Lending --- What Every Borrower Should Know</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of key concepts and principals every borrower should know concerning the issue of predatory lending, including what it is, and what relief is available to those adversely affected by such illicit practice.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/brief_primer_on_predatory_lend.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/brief_primer_on_predatory_lend.html</guid>
         <category>Predatory Lending</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:55:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Decoy Indication: New Hybrid Method for Off Label Promotion of Medications?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.plos.org/press/plme-05-10-fugh-berman.pdf">article</a> published by the Public Library of Science Medicine (PLoS Medicine), has highlighted new innovative ways in which pharmaceutical companies are promoting medications for off-label use.  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/decoy_indication_new_hybrid_me_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/decoy_indication_new_hybrid_me_1.html</guid>
         <category>Adverse Drug Update</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:13:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Consumers Fight-Back Against Slow Internet Service, Limited Bandwidth, and Egregious Customer Fees --- Comcast, HughesNet and Qwest</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This past year has been a “bellwether” year for consumer advocacy groups with respect to reform and Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”).  <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/consumers_fightback_against_sl_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/consumers_fightback_against_sl_1.html</guid>
         <category>IT/Technology</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:46:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bard® Perfex® Hernia Plug --- Increased Risk of Nerve Entanglement?  </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.bardnordic.com/main/product.asp?sectionTypeId=2&sectionId=19&productId=178">Bard® PerFix® Plug</a>, introduced by Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc., in 1993, is a medical device used to repair “primary and recurrent inguinal hernias.”  </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/bard_perfex_hernia_plug_increa_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/bard_perfex_hernia_plug_increa_1.html</guid>
         <category>Medical Devices</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:00:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pfizer Will Agree to Pay $894 Million to Settle Celebrex and Bextra Claims</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Pfizer has recently <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/news/press_releases/pfizer_press_releases.jsp?rssUrl=http://mediaroom.pfizer.com/portal/site/pfizer/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&ndmConfigId=1010794&newsId=20081017005371&newsLang=en">announced</a> that it will "resolve substantially all of the personal injury cases, consumer fraud cases and state attorneys general claims involving its non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID)" pain medications Bextra and Celebrex, which Pfizer voluntarily withdrew from the U.S. market in 2005. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/pfizer_will_agree_to_pay_894_m_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/pfizer_will_agree_to_pay_894_m_1.html</guid>
         <category>Adverse Drug Update</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:00:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Psoriasis Drug Raptiva Gets “Black Box” Warning - Associated Risk of Infection and PML</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Just this week, the psoriasis drug Raptiva received a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/NEW01905.html">“black box” warning</a>, the FDA’s strongest, regarding <a href="http://www.webmd.com/brain/progressive-multifocal-leukoencephalopathy">progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy </a>(PML) and other potentially fatal infections. Raptiva, manufactured by Genentech, is a medication given via weekly injection to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults only.  Raptiva is a biologic drug that works to suppress the immune system with the goal of fewer psoriasis flare-ups.  However, as with any immunosuppressant, the use of Raptiva compromises the immune system to such an extent that it increases the risks of serious infections, some fatal, and other malignancies. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/psoriasis_drug_raptiva_gets_bl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.druginjurylawyerblog.com/2008/10/psoriasis_drug_raptiva_gets_bl.html</guid>
         <category>Adverse Drug Update</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:55:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
